Your arguments seem comically out-of-touch and perhaps even offered in bad faith.
Some people are overworked, but that doesn't mean that mass unemployment will help: it just means that some people will remain overworked and others will sink into poverty.
You are conflating, I assume intentionally, the legal proceeding bankruptcy, with the colloquial term bankruptcy meaning simply having zero liquidity. For most working people, the latter is definitely not a good state to be in.
Your first assertion is the least coherent. Are you seriously saying that when people have less money, they're inclined to spend more on charity? Give me a break.
> You are conflating, I assume intentionally, the legal proceeding bankruptcy
Wrong. The macroeconomic "fear" of disinflation is that people will not be able to make interest payments and default on their debt. This will cascade because those debt issuers also have debts of their own, and there will be an unwinding. Sometimes a good old jubilee is what you want.
Some people are overworked, but that doesn't mean that mass unemployment will help: it just means that some people will remain overworked and others will sink into poverty.
You are conflating, I assume intentionally, the legal proceeding bankruptcy, with the colloquial term bankruptcy meaning simply having zero liquidity. For most working people, the latter is definitely not a good state to be in.
Your first assertion is the least coherent. Are you seriously saying that when people have less money, they're inclined to spend more on charity? Give me a break.