More importantly - who is the judge? The government? You? If so, then are you allowed to decide what is 'good' for others? Are they allowed to decide what is 'good' for you?

You see what I mean? There is no absolute when it comes to entertainment. There is no good or bad. There is just stuff that entertains, and stuff that does not.

    Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
    Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
    Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
    And summer's lease hath all too short a date: 
    The Sonnets, 18.

    http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext97/wssnt10.txt

Harry Potter is REAL present-day entertainment, and anyone who wants to get into the industry has to understand that.

Good point.

Now if we are talking say "The A-Team" I'd agree. Bodie, Doyle, Tiger and jewelry man, Mr-T. I can see how some might spell Mr. Tee, Mr T or even Mr. Tea if you're a Brit. But meddling with the spelling of the greatest, most recognised writer in the history of English literature?

"... Harry Potter is REAL present-day entertainment, and anyone who wants to get into the industry has to understand that ..."

I agree J.K. Rawlings, is a modern master of story telling. But I can name plenty of classic literature novels that have gone straight to mass visual media bypassing their literary cousins. Behind each great bit of entertainment is a great script. A lot of these scripts are based on classic lit.

http://shakespeareauthorship.com/name1.html

For me, good entertainment is that which does something new. Something stimulating.

Good move substituting his argument for yours, as I didn't think you had much of a point, but now I think maybe you do. :)