Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My city has a public square and a privately owned mall. Just short of being violent you are allowed to do and say as you wish in the public square. But most people prefer to go to the much cleaner, privately owned mall. Where our values and polite society are reaffirmed.

We choose moderation constantly in our lives, intentionally.



> My city has a public square and a privately owned mall

Interesting that you bring up that example, because private malls are absolutely required to follow certain public accommodations laws, depending on the jurisdiction.

So, just like private malls are forced to do certain things by the government, people are saying that a similar set of public accommodations, that we already force malls to do, should be extended to other platforms.

EX: https://www.aclusocal.org/en/know-your-rights/protesters

"Shopping malls must allow speech activity subject to reasonable time, place and manner rules— ask your local mall for their rules."


This rule is almost certainly applicable to California. Most mall protests that I've seen happen near the mall or in front of the mall, rarely inside the plaza. And usually with the agreement of the owners.


Do you ask the Chamber of Commerce which malls and stores to frequent whenever you want to shop? I think that would be a great way to avoid the bad areas with all the hobos and sketchy businesses that are probably fronts for drug dealers anyway.

You can "choose moderation" by not viewing Twitter accounts and conversations you don't care about and muting words you dislike.


> You can "choose moderation" by not viewing Twitter accounts and conversations you don't care about and muting words you dislike.

In that case however I would also like the possibility to turn off any algorithms that recommend stuff to me. I want to see only things i put on my whitelist, otherwise i will have to constantly moderate and it will take up loads of my time.

As long as that doesn't happen I am more than happy to let others do the moderation based on some frameworks that I agreed on (ToS in Twitters case).


If you think a ToS can capture every bigotry, propaganda technique, and misinformation campaign in perpetuity, I am impressed and hope for success in installing it on every centralized internet platform. Otherwise we would need individual humans at a corporation owned by rich men interpreting a vague set of principles about what "hate" and "misinfo" means, which is a different discussion...

But I'm not sure how it could work without having users agree to a new ToS frequently, due to things like the Euphemism Treadmill: https://www.cambridgeblog.org/2020/08/ableist-language-and-t...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: