Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not banning and suspending people or hiding tweets for alleged violations of vague and arbitrary standards would be great, to start with.

Go to any political tweet and you'll see countless hateful messages, why aren't they banned, yet others are? I've never seen any reason for it. Clearly they take a side or draw a line on some issues they consider important to control, but not others.

It seems to me it would be far better in my opinion for twitter to foster strength rather than fragility by empowering users to take responsibility for their own feelings and have the tools and maturity to not read things they can't cope with, rather than trying to police what people write centrally. It absolutely could be the modern town square and would be great if it supported real freedom of speech, in my opinion.



If that was true why are unregulated platforms, like 4chan, not popular?


If what was true?


"...absolutely could be the modern town square and would be great if it supported real freedom of speech, in my opinion."

My claim is that (in the US) if a platform allowed everything that was legal it wouldn't be popular.


I don't see how a comparison with 4chan is any evidence for that. There are also heavily regulated forums which are not popular. So clearly that's not the reason for whether or not one is going to be popular.


Per you: how regulated/censored a platform is doesn't have an effect on its popularity

However your first comment says "far better in my opinion for twitter..."


I didn't say it doesn't have an effect.


It's not difficult to understand the argument: 4chan is the largest unregulated platform, much smaller than the largest regulated platforms.


And it's a fallacy because there are many differences between them.


Statistics is not a fallacy


Non sequitur.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: