There's literally no difference. None. This was tried before with special locks that 'only the TSA had the keys to open'. The keys were posted online for anyone to make their own. It's also been tried commercially with various DRM and failed.
There is no such thing as a 'government only, and only with a warrant' backdoor. There is either private or not private.
The problem with TSA keys is that they are all the same, can easily be cloned, and couldn't be rotated.
It is possible to design a system where judges have their own hardware keys. Hardware keys can not be cloned assuming strong tamper protection. If a hardware key gets stolen it can be revoked as being valid and a judge can be issued a new one.
DRM is different because the client ultimately has to have the keys to decrypt the content they have been permitted access to.
Shot in the dark here? Which Government are you talking about? Saudi? Where being gay is a death sentence?
No? How about the US where being Japanese was illegal?
China's got the most people, perhaps we take a wold wide vote to see?
Biggest land mass?
Millionaires per population (the 1%)?
Who would control the creation of the keys? I mean which tech vender would control access to my android phones encryption? My phone was made in China, and the chips inside it were made in China. They also have the most people, so it seems fair they control the keys.
There is no such thing as a 'government only, and only with a warrant' backdoor. There is either private or not private.