Maybe, if 'content' is defined appropriately. They do seem to agree on the times and existence of events in eventually consistent fashion.
One can show other people's calenders and the other won't. Meetings can be joined from one but not the other. The result of creating a new meeting is different depending on which entry point is used.
So I end up with both outlook/calender and teams/calender open, and frequently guess incorrectly which window to use for the operation because they look similar. The web app is a different slice of behaviour again.
This seems like something Microsoft had to go out of their way to achieve - write basically the same thing three times to basically the same spec and have them all look and behave somewhat differently. Though I concede the redundancy is useful when one is broken. Today one had audio and one didn't.
One can show other people's calenders and the other won't. Meetings can be joined from one but not the other. The result of creating a new meeting is different depending on which entry point is used.
So I end up with both outlook/calender and teams/calender open, and frequently guess incorrectly which window to use for the operation because they look similar. The web app is a different slice of behaviour again.
This seems like something Microsoft had to go out of their way to achieve - write basically the same thing three times to basically the same spec and have them all look and behave somewhat differently. Though I concede the redundancy is useful when one is broken. Today one had audio and one didn't.