> "I didn’t say that I’m personally a smarty-pants Haskell hacker."
You didn't? You said serious Haskell programmers are smart and then pointed out that you worked on the largest Haskell codebase on the planet; we were supposed to not conclude that you are smart, but rather that people working on said codebase are non-serious Haskell programmers?
"Nobody likes to talk about it, but we Haskell programmers are smarter than everyone else, especially bickering Javascript plebs" is kinda surprising it hasn't been flagged as flamebait.
Given your befuddled comment, I'd say no, you don't, evidently.
I've been here longer than some readers have been alive. Some of us are not interesting in cultivating a persona. I love your cheeky little attempt at an appeal to authority though.
You're going to repeat this same issue as long as you have the "but they always get away with it, why cant I" mentality. Two faults in judgement don't make a good decision, no matter how many take part in it.
I didn’t say that I’m personally a smarty-pants Haskell hacker. I said that those people skew smart and capable.
How come @dang is always there like the Batman spotlight when I stray into ad hominem but I always get smashed with this stuff?