Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hopefully they fire most of the management, retain what technical talent they decide, and effectively reboot the entire company.


They already decide to keep Kotick... not a very good start.


Think of what you acquire when you acquire a company. You acquire intellectual property - products & ideas, you acquire people - future ideas, you acquire customer base - players. If you behead the company you certainly will lose critical people with it risking the products and customer base too. This isn’t Microsoft’s first acquisition, they’ll manage realignment of the new organization differently than just wholesale ejections. I’m sure Bobby’s new schedule has time for rest while he vests.


At least on the side of Blizzard, almost all of the original creators and developers are gone by now, surely some will follow after the merge.


The video game development industry has a lot of financial similarities to pharmaceutical development.

As a major, why should I take the (large) risk to develop novel product? When I can outsource that function to a large number of smaller companies, who either go bankrupt or produce something of value, which I can then afford to pay a premium to acquire, after its value is known? I.e. if I can substitute money for risk, why wouldn't I?


The IP is the real value here, so this seems likely.


All technical talent already left Blizzard - also the reason why they didn't produce anything (of value) in last 5 years.


They have plenty of technical talent, it’s the artistic vision that left.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: