> in angular world if you are not super lucky to get pro developers with good angular experience you get a giant mess
True, but you only needed one good Angular dev, in a senior or lead role, to avoid that. I had the enormous privilege of getting to be that person a few years back, and maybe that colors my interpretation a little.
> They added components much later , not sure what was in angular team head not creating the component stuff from the beginning
My impression is that Angular 2 grew components largely in response to and because of React. The concept wasn't precisely new, but React did formulate it in a way that can be fairly called novel.
Componets/Widgets were super old in Desktop world so React did not invented them.
This is why I wonder if angular devs ever ever did any GUI development before creating angular, or maybe angular was just a simple toy and for some reason it grew too much.
I can't find 1 good thing to say about angular1(version <=1.5) compared to Qt,WPF,Flex4 . Let me know if you worked with that old version any good thing about it (that is not it is a bit better then bad jQuery code)
True, but you only needed one good Angular dev, in a senior or lead role, to avoid that. I had the enormous privilege of getting to be that person a few years back, and maybe that colors my interpretation a little.
> They added components much later , not sure what was in angular team head not creating the component stuff from the beginning
My impression is that Angular 2 grew components largely in response to and because of React. The concept wasn't precisely new, but React did formulate it in a way that can be fairly called novel.