> even the greatest non-fiction books aren't optimal when the objective is learning
Says who? I say he's doing it wrong.
> the methods he's suggesting have decades of research suggesting to learning that's much more efficient than traditional reading
Where are the results of that research then, the culmination in the form of medium superior to books? His mneumonic quantum book doesn't look like one. People need understanding, not memorization.
Says who? I say he's doing it wrong.
> the methods he's suggesting have decades of research suggesting to learning that's much more efficient than traditional reading
Where are the results of that research then, the culmination in the form of medium superior to books? His mneumonic quantum book doesn't look like one. People need understanding, not memorization.