> And lab standards are already stringent, so leaks will keep happening. I don't believe the virus was leaked, not because it couldn't have but because it's equally probable that it's natural.
So you're not interested in knowing whether it was a leak, or if it was, whether it was accidental, and you're not at all interested in making bio labs more secure (which one might be, if one knew it was a lab leak!)?!
So... no need to improve, just let it keep happening?
And you don't think there's any interest in the science behind making a custom virus, or spreading it?
OK, fine, you're not interested. Ah, but:
> so scientists are not curious to find out how they did it, if they did
All scientists? Most? A significant number of them?
Are you saying no one should be curious about this, or just that you aren't?
> It's a politically interesting question though.
Ah, so do investigate? I can't tell what you meant.
So you're not interested in knowing whether it was a leak, or if it was, whether it was accidental, and you're not at all interested in making bio labs more secure (which one might be, if one knew it was a lab leak!)?!
So... no need to improve, just let it keep happening?
And you don't think there's any interest in the science behind making a custom virus, or spreading it?
OK, fine, you're not interested. Ah, but:
> so scientists are not curious to find out how they did it, if they did
All scientists? Most? A significant number of them?
Are you saying no one should be curious about this, or just that you aren't?
> It's a politically interesting question though.
Ah, so do investigate? I can't tell what you meant.