Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> no one-person gets to define "the" problem

Well of course, this is not a dictatorship and I'm not a dictator. I'm stating my opinion on a forum.

In the same way flat-Earthers have no place teaching astronomy, someone who believes the pay gap is women getting paid less for the same work has no place teaching sociology. That is intolerant, but so it should be.

Gatekeeping is inevitable and necessary, the problem is that the wrong people currently hold the keys. You can find yourself locked out for stating that the wage gap is one side of a compromise, or that men get harsher criminal punishments (for the same crimes), or that female-perpetrated sexual abuse has been grossly undercounted (my personal grievance). If we want to confront these issues, then the existing gatekeepers need to be replaced, not tolerated.



But fields of science/academia have factual authority that a random persons' opinion does not.

The "conversation", which I assume to be the societal conversation i.e. marketplace of ideas is explicitly a free, and public one.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: