> it's hard to define at what scale a company should be subject to public scrutiny/control
FB is one of the largest companies on the planet with worldwide effects. There isn't another 10x for it to grow. If it's not subject to scrutiny/control at this scale, then it will never be subject to it.
> would like to see more testimony from users who believe that they have been personally harmed
Victims of genocide are notoriously unable to testify.
> If [Facebook]'s not subject to scrutiny/control at this scale, then it will never be subject to it
Yes, exactly, cat's out of the bag. I generally don't think we should use federal democratic decision-making bodies to decide how a company should be run.
> Victims of genocide are notoriously unable to testify
Noted, but I also do not believe that Facebook's policies either equate to genocide or indirectly result in increased genocide as understood in the most obvious/severe definition of the word 'genocide'.
FB is one of the largest companies on the planet with worldwide effects. There isn't another 10x for it to grow. If it's not subject to scrutiny/control at this scale, then it will never be subject to it.
> would like to see more testimony from users who believe that they have been personally harmed
Victims of genocide are notoriously unable to testify.