Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a lever that pries open the non-qualified 'more speech = more freedom' argument, by demonstrating very succinctly that in order to maximize freedom, we, ironically, have to restrict it.


What? Who is arguing more speech = more freedom?

Speech restrictions limit the subject matter if speech, not the sheer volume of speech overall.

You also seem to be conflating the freedom to say what you want with the right to be listened to.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: