Who gets thrown in the clink? How about "as many as possible, and the higher up the better"?
"We can't jail them all" does not imply "therefore jail none of them".
Precedents matter. The precedent that was set is "widespread fraud is fine; if enough people are in on it, nobody can be jailed". Is that really the precedent we want?
"We can't jail them all" does not imply "therefore jail none of them".
Precedents matter. The precedent that was set is "widespread fraud is fine; if enough people are in on it, nobody can be jailed". Is that really the precedent we want?