Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Personally, I click on the launch threads because they're part of the current batch: a clear indication that they're part of the current batch (rather than just a generic "launch HN" announcement) is much more valuable to me than the reference to the type of business. The "Launch HN" title is used by non-YC people, meaning these threads come across as non-YC threads than YC threads.

I think on balance you're probably right that excluding a startup from the title is a problem though -- so yeah, in hindsight, I think you made the right choice.



I changed it to say "Launch YC" instead of "Launch HN" this time round, for reasons related to what you're saying. Doesn't seem to have landed though :)

Another thought I had was "Meet S21". Better? It would free up a char! "Meet YC S21" is too long.

"YC S21" would be the shortest. That is, something like "YC S21: Foo, Bar, Baz" with a word or phrase for each startup. But I'm not sure if that would convey that it's a launch thread.

Another possibility: "YC Launch" instead of "Launch YC".

Our original idea was "Meet the Batch" but that's way too long.


"Meet S21" would be completely meaningless to me without context. It's not a shorthand I associate with anything. What about YC21?


Another user posted a comment suggesting something like

  Launch YC S21 - Batch thread #3
Would that be clear enough? We may end up with something like that.


How about "YC S21 Launch"?


That's too long as a prefix to be followed by the startups, and too generic as a title on its own.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: