> Splits have happened and do happen, there's about 3 or 4 direct Bitcoin forks but they have little use. Social consensus is what ultimately controls which blockchain is viewed as the legitimate one.
If you had a node running since 2016 and didn't touch it at all, right not it would still be following the Bitcoin blockchain and not any of the splits that were created since via hard-forks.
If you had a node running since 2016 and didn't touch it at all, right not it would still be following the Bitcoin blockchain and not any of the splits that were created since via hard-forks.