Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"...I... clicked 'buy'...and it really bought this app...the App Store...It's not being run well...beware!!!" Does this make sense to anyone? Don't click buy!


> "..I... clicked 'buy'...and it really bought this app"

Gee really? What else is clicking "Buy" supposed to do?


While I haven't used the AppStore myself, I'd expect the Buy process to take at least two user steps -- a good rule of thumb for an interface action with permanent effects, to guard against accidental clicks.

Maybe the user was expecting one more level of confirmation than the AppStore actually had?


Does your email program have a confirmation step after its "Send" button?

Confirmation steps, in practice, don't really help. After a few uses, people build up the muscle memory that "action, confirmation" is the action. Then the one time in a hundred they want to cancel, they don't realize until too late.

One approach to try would be, for any purchase over $5, make a "confirmation step" that looks like a restaurant bill, and require the user to sign it (with their finger). Perhaps "sign name next to a big number" would be enough to jar them.

But really, the solution is to make it undoable/refundable. No matter what barriers you put up, somebody will do it by mistake (guaranteed), and is going to want their money back. If I can return a $1000 jacket in real life, I should be able to return a $1000 no-op app.


The really fun part is that Apple's policy states the developer must reimburse refunds 100%. Apple's 30% cut stays with them.

Any money the dev got through "accidental" purchases is likely going to fly away again with interest.


Hmm, keep the $1000 and get kicked off the App Store, or lose $300 to stay on? I'm pretty sure the guy is just going to keep the grand.


sending an email != charging your credit card


with $999.99


Don't turn on one-click ordering.


When I hit Control-Enter to send, it actually does confirm with me that I want to do that; however, it does not when I use the mouse... (Thunderbird)

But I still completely agree with you.


This is the common behaviour in most ecommerce sites so is a reasonable assumption. When money is changing hands, verification should be standard practice.


By default, all iTunes store purchases are verified. Only if the user specifies that they don't want to have to confirm again does the store allow one-click purchasing. Though it would be nice if there were a big-ticket override, i.e. every item over $25 must be explicitly approved.


Please, read the article, examine the photo, do something before you comment. It clearly says in the review referenced that the guy in this case forgot that the buy confirmation was disabled (this is a preference).

The app store has one more level of confirmation- this guy just "forgot" that he had it turned off.


I did read the article but -- as I said in my comment -- I haven't used AppStore before, so I have no idea what "iclick" is or why something done on his laptop would affect his iPhone... I assume from your comment that it is the option to turn off confirmation?

If so, it strikes me as bad design that another user on another device can affect whether or not you get a buy confirmation on yours.


Normally: prompt the user for a password, then purchase.


unless you've purchased something else recently


It's bad if the user interface for something this important depends on hidden state that the user might not remember.


Yes, point taken.

However, I can imagine people seeing "$999" and some pattern recognition firing in their brain interpreting it as "$9.99" because that would be a more reasonable price for an iPhone app, and clicking "Buy" before the rational part of the brain realized the error.

So I imagine that the whole point of setting an iPhone app price at $999 was to scam people in exactly this way.

Maybe a modification to one-click would be a "are you really, really sure" dialog for suspiciously high prices.

This person, of course, does not have this excuse, because they did correctly interpret "$999", and clicked anyway.


The price, of course, was $999.99, which isn't deceiving at all.


In what sense was this a scam?

Obscured, hard to find or misleading price? Nope. False or misleading promises of what the program does? Nope.

So what's the scam? That you think it's overpriced? That he bought it and now doesn't want it? That the author created it with the sole intention of making money?

Caveat Emptor, and all that. Yes, I think there should be an "undo" option, a cooldown period, right to cancellation and money back no questions asked - but there's no wrongdoing here - he has no right to feel outraged or hard done by about the situation.


Or possibly it was done because it was the highest possible price you can sell your app for. And since the whole point was to show off your wealth, its likely $999 was picked for this purpose.


Doesn't Amazon hold a patent for "one-click shopping"?

Or is this "one-touch" shopping?

;)


Yes, and Apple licensed Amazon's patent.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-Click#Apple_Computer

WTF? Unreal. It was a joke the day is was born. My god, I'm going to patent sitting on one ass cheek, cuz, you know, nobody's actually patented it yet. Think of the license fees!


A far, far better thing to patent is "One more click buying," -- sell it to Amazon, and they have a monopoly by induction.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: