Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In response to his accusations, I DO think that most classics probably ought not to be read. But that DOESN'T mean I'm anti-intellectual - rather, it means I believe that iteration is everything and we just need to upgrade our old firmware. Classics are, by and large, inefficient mediums of information. The fact that they are still around today is really just a function of the fact that they were still around yesterday. And what if every nugget of knowledge and insight that is contained in a classic could be transmitted in a much smaller package? We'd have trouble remembering and applying it all, sure, but not if they were a part of our collective consciousness - as many ideals found in the classics already are. Believe it or not, you already know most of what Kant, or Twain, or Chaucer, or Shakespeare has to tell you. They were all human, just like us, and we are more than capable of thinking what they thought without reviewing what they said first.


I properly know all that Shakespeare has to say to me, but the importance of him is how he says it, how he makes English come alive and sing.

I have never read anybody who has mastered the English language so completely has he has.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: