Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I like and agree with the article, but:

    an attempt was made to port part of that code (the
    planner) from Lisp to C++. After a year that effort
    had to be abandoned because the planner team just
    couldn't make it work. 
I'm sure they'd struggle just as much if the planner was written in assembly, and not because assembly is a far more elegant language...


Given that assembly is simpler than C++ both syntactically and semantically, a reasonable argument could be made that it is a more elegant language.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: