> Classic fund manager who can't make returns in a new market regime and decides to cope by complaining on CNBC
I'm disappointed that the top comment at HN regarding such an interesting topic is nothing more than an ad hominem that sidesteps any of the points made in the article.
If the fund manager quoted in the article is wrong then you should have no problem presenting a rational case on how and why he is wrong. Instead, all you did amounted to name calling. How does this elevate us?
I'm disappointed that the top comment at HN regarding such an interesting topic is nothing more than an ad hominem that sidesteps any of the points made in the article.
If the fund manager quoted in the article is wrong then you should have no problem presenting a rational case on how and why he is wrong. Instead, all you did amounted to name calling. How does this elevate us?