Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bayesian Inference does not explain how new knowledge is created.


Is it really going to fall apart because you aren't born with all the priors you would theoretically need?


I don't understand your question. But the point of science is to create new knowledge, so it seems highly relevant.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: