Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If DMs were the real loot, they wouldn’t have exposed the hack by tweeting on the account.


If DMs were the real loot, the tweets were a "proof of work" (to show the accounts had really been owned).

You can prove you have 'blackmail materials' just by proving you own the bitcoin wallet.


They needed to reset credentials so this could've never been a stealth attack. By making it public, any later leak of DMs is much more likely to be accepted as authentic. Without that, most people would've doubted the authenticity of leaked material.


Precisely. And who's to say which leaked DMs are real and which ones are faked? If you're interested in this kind of stuff, I recommend the book Active Measures.


Perhaps it is a form of proof that they actually have access to the accounts and thus the DMs. Just posting claimed DMs that can be deleted and denied has a lower probability of being believed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: