Why don't you use Erlang? Its much closer to you definition of OOP. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		nickik on March 17, 2011 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Don't distract new programmers with OOP Why don't you use Erlang? Its much closer to you definition of OOP.

Ingaz on March 17, 2011 [–]

Exactly.

And I think that Erlang is most closest to Kay's definition of OOP. (If we can drop "Everything is object")

Erlang processes are objects.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact