It's confusing. RubyCentral pays for hosting and "ops" (not sure how much 'ops' staff time, if any?), but I think not development? And RubyTogether hypothetically pays for development (some but not neccesarily all that's needed), which can include new features but also required maintenance (we all know software requires care and feeding, it's never "done")?

But I could have this not right?

It has been confusing for a variety of reasons.

And I think there are mixed reviews with how well it's going overall, especially the RubyTogether part.