We read the same article, and you did not understand it beyond the screaming claims, and shallow statements.
No, him saying it's "broken by design" is really not substantiated. SigSpoof is certainly not a design specific bug, but an implementation flaw.
On other hand, the "new agey" crypto messengers mess up the protocol and the app internal mechanism hard, and that's compsci101 mistake no matter how much they gaslight that.
It's them benefiting from their stuff not being subject to serious security review because of lack of adoption, not the other way around.
No, him saying it's "broken by design" is really not substantiated. SigSpoof is certainly not a design specific bug, but an implementation flaw.
On other hand, the "new agey" crypto messengers mess up the protocol and the app internal mechanism hard, and that's compsci101 mistake no matter how much they gaslight that.
It's them benefiting from their stuff not being subject to serious security review because of lack of adoption, not the other way around.