Hanlon fails due to second order effects. For instance, I have a "really secure" voting app to make, I hire 3 interns and give them 4 months to do it. Of course they're trying their hardest to make the app, and they'll likely fail. But hey, I'm non the wiser.
This. I have started to think of this rejoinder to Hanlon after the Iowa app fiasco.
Stupidity may be a great cover for uncoordinated malice leading to widespread negligence. A bit like “chaos monkey” but by those who’d like to rearrange the pieces.
I'd describe it as a vicious cycle of incompetence and misunderstanding risk. They exacerbate each other. It all begins with someone trying to get something done as cheaply as possible in an area about which they are ignorant.
Whether they are a "corrupt cowboy" or "cost-efficient genius" mostly depends on whether the project is a success, and that depends on luck.
We don't have the exact details here yet but I'm willing to bet that a rather fat contract was given to someone affiliated with a Likud center member (equivalent to a US party boss) who then sought the cheapest provider while pocketing the difference or maybe handed it to their relative.
Except in this case the decisions were probably made by an underqualified codeling at the bottom who possibly could not even been expected to know better and not take the assignment, that's the immediate stupidity part - the malice is what led to this situation in the first place and saw the result rolled to production.
Absolutely. Malice is almost always the cause. That's why Hanlon's razor is absurd. It supposes a version of human nature that doesn't exist. Surely humans are generally stupid, but they are also scheming, lying, manipulating, violent, and definitely malicious way more than they are stupid. History shows us this over and over again.
