Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I know it's an unpopular opinion but I don't see the point of kubernetes. It's a complexity monster which is not providing any real advantage over way simpler solutions.

The main selling point of k8s over any other tool is that it provides a single, unified, secured, multi-tenant API endpoint for managing all of production. Your developers updating their production app use the same API as a CI system that wants to spawn some worker containers, and the same API as an operator service maintaining a Redis cluster. All of this results in a single view into production. If things go well, the end result is that you swap daily interaction with a handful of different tools with disparate states (Terraform, Ansible/Chef/Salt/Puppet, shell scripts and proprietary tools) into just managing payloads on k8s.

> Even pod to pod communication, which would be trivial to do using any sane solution is a huge pain in kubernetes.

How is it a pain? A pod behind a service provides a DNS name that allows running requests to it - this handles the bulk of production traffic. If you want to contact a particular pod that is not behind a service just use the k8s API to retrieve details about it (like Prometheus does via k8s pod service discovery).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: