Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Historically, yes. There was a reason previously the CAA and EASA were historically happy accept the FAA's certification for new aircraft, on the assumption the FAA were very good at its job.

That no longer seems to be the case (given the fact that EASA now want to have their pilots fly the MAX before it returns to service), and there's well documented evidence (many news articles over the past few months talk about this) showing that over the past 10 years, the FAA's budget was drastically cut, forcing them to effectively outsource certification in part to Boeing to "self-certify".



[flagged]


Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopia Airlines Flight 302 were caused by the FAAs failure to adequately regulate the safety of the airplane type.


Nope, as the FAA has no jurisdiction over those flights.

The FAA isn't the global airline police.


They are the Boeing police though, which is where they were delinquent in their duties.

> The FAA isn't the global airline police.

Then why were they on-site in Indonesia doing the investigation?


They aren't the global Boeing police, and doing an investigation doesn't mean you're in charge or capable of regulating the entire planet.

But you know all this, and are just being a troll, so I'm done.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: