Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No I don’t agree. A compiler pass is not a compiler. An non-optimising C to assembly compiler is not compiling to the same level of abstraction.


>A compiler pass is not a compiler.

What is the difference, if there's one well-defined language before the pass and another after it?

>A non-optimising C to assembly compiler is not compiling to the same level of abstraction.

Neither are "transpilers", otherwise they'd be quite useless. Abstraction isn't a linear hirerarchy, in any case.


Terms are fuzzy. That doesn't mean they're useless. When I talk about 'transpilers' instead of 'compilers' it instantly gives people context.

The term's been in use since the 60s, when most compilers were not optimising.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: