Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Perhaps they made a mistake and just used "fracking" to refer to this whole category of extraction techniques? If they did, does it make much of a difference? These techniques have got to end because they're not sustainable practices.


It absolutely makes a difference. There's no way to properly regulate an industry without understanding it.

But like I said above, people don't care about fracking because they don't even understand what it is. It's just a buzzword people use when what they really want is to stop the entire industry. Or maybe they hate how our society runs. Or they hate rich people. They're angry about something but it's almost never the practice of using water pressure to break rocks thousands of feet beneath the earth's surface.


So we shouldn't regulate these extraction practices because journalists don't use the right words to refer to these harmful practices?


Clueless movements elect clueless representatives who mirror their clueless beliefs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: