Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> My contention with ORMs is that, if you need to know SQL, just use SQL since it prevents the need to know how non-SQL gets translated to SQL.

I feel the same way about Wiki syntax as ORMs.

While SQLAlchemy is great for getting the DDL done, my SQL-fu is such that I wind up just using SQLAlchemy as a glorified connection manager while I construct the SQL strings directly rather than muddy up a sophisticated query by translating it into Python.

The same holds true for Wiki syntax. If I'm already proficient at HTML, it buys me precious little to use this 'easier' syntax if sometimes I'm in Redmine, sometimes I'm in Confluence, or wherever else I land.

Just let me code the page already!



In terms of wiki syntax, HTML is just so damned noisy that I'm fine with Markdown--but mostly because Markdown is fairly standardized and I don't have to learn a totally different syntax for everything.


"Fairly"

So I spend as much time faffing about with how this particular tool does anchors as I would just doing the "a" tag outright in HTML.


The real question is why aren’t you using the WYSIWYG editor most wikis have these days.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: