Yes, more lobbying will help, and that's why I donate to the EFF, but there is obviously a very persistent and difficult problem which never goes away.
I'm not really interested in "external magic". The core structure is wrong. We should create a new paradigm that works for the citizens by default.
This future is a long way off, but I expect we'll see the new paradigm you're taking about take shape as a collection of smart contracts on a cryptocurrency platform.
Then, it will have to compete with the existing ways. If it's worthy of being the new normal, it should be able to compete and win.
I think that means that economic activity on the platform with the sane IP policy would need to be more desirable for both buyers and sellers. It's obvious why sellers would want to avoid using platforms that are either so riddled with bogus IP that they can't operate (like USD), or so bereft of enforcement that they get no credit for originality (like CNY). But an incentive structure that keeps buyers from jumping ship to the latter sort... That's going to take some creativity.
My best shot at it would be this:
Supposing the underlying system is a proof of stake system, perhaps your staking rewards could be reduced or increased based on the extent to which your purchasing habits transferred value to platforms that don't support the desired IP features.
So even though you may pay more for the IP compliant product up front, in the long run the system rewards you for not funding its IP-deviant competitor.
The savvy thing for a buyer to do in such a situation would be to have separate identities on each platform, so you spend your no-rules tokens on no-rules products and you spend your regulated tokens on regulated products, thereby avoiding penalties for being a traitor. Hopefully, the market cap of either economy's token would then hinge on which one functioned better independently of the other: May the economy with the best set of policies win (where winning means attracting the participants from its competition).
The trouble is, we don't have infinite resources to just spawn economic petri dishes like this. Eventually the competing economies will come into conflict over more that just which is more fun to participate in. Eventually they'll start wasting resources on fighting over access to some mineral or whatever. I'm still noodling on fixes for that, but even so, I think that such a system would be no worse than the one we have.
I'm not really interested in "external magic". The core structure is wrong. We should create a new paradigm that works for the citizens by default.