At least on Windows Mercurial doesn't support filenames written in various languages. Git does. So Mercurial was made for one billion people while git for the rest 6.5 billion of us.
What does "written in various languages" mean? Mixing multiple legacy encodings in one filename? Unicode filenames work fine on Linux (I just tested it with Chinese) and I would be very surprised if they didn't on Windows.
The problem, as I understand it, was filenames were read and written as bytes. That's fine if everybody is on the same platform but it doesn't always work when moving between, for example, Linux (UTF-8) and Windows (UTF-16).
Hm, the Mercurial wiki does mention that's it was/is a problem on Windows.
I was surprised because we've been using it for years at work, sharing repositories between Linux and Windows, and we have never been bitten by this. Maybe the latin-1 subset of Unicode works? Or all the files we worked on just happened to have ASCII names (despite us being mostly non-Americans).
Well yes and on Windows they are a sequence of 16bit values, not utf-16. My point was the encoding of filenames differ. So you can't do a byte-for-byte copy and expect the same results across platforms.
As an aside, it'd be perfectly legitimate for Mercurial (and git) to reject filenames that aren't representable in unicode.
