Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why bother reading the book when the blog is either flawed (as this post is) or dishonest (as the one from yesterday is)?

If the blog is junk science, it's unlikely that the book is better.



Neither are junk science. People's junk science detectors and the competition to be the first to declare that something is "fatally flawed" are going off excessively quickly. (See also the rush to be the first that some show or something has 'jumped the shark'.) If there's junk science afoot it's unfortunately in the "mainstream".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: