Is that AND? "&" and "+" aren't the same thing. (even in that sentence, 'plus' and 'and' aren't synonymous. Replacing 'and' with 'plus' completely changes the meaning...)
Everything about the way the article is written suggests it is about the potential for 2D life occurring in 3D space, and nothing about single dimensional realms.
Consider graphene, a 2 dimensional fabric in 3D space. I'm sure this is closer to the point.
Everything about the way the article is written suggests it is about the potential for 2D life occurring in 3D space, and nothing about single dimensional realms.
Consider graphene, a 2 dimensional fabric in 3D space. I'm sure this is closer to the point.
PLUS, versus AND.