Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Getting banned from YouTube is not a violation of individual rights. Forcing a company to host videos for free sounds like a violation of individual rights though.


No it's totally not a violation of anyone's rights, but that doesn't stop me from being able to oppose the idea. Like how I support drugs being legalized but I don't think everyone should start doing drugs.


> No it's totally not a violation of anyone's rights, but that doesn't stop me from being able to oppose the idea.

Well, I think everyone in this thread can at least agree that nothing should stop anyone from being able to oppose the idea.


They aren't hosting the videos for free - they're displaying them alongside advertisements to make revenue off those videos.

Also, the rights given an individual are distinct from the rights given to a company, and IMO are distinct from the rights a company deserves (i.e. a company has no inherent right to exist).


By "free" I mean "at no cost to the user". If I wanted to host my videos on AWS or bare metal I'd have to pay for the privilege.


Marginalizing a group of individuals for nothing but their culture is a violation of individual rights if you ask me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: