Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, Apple just want to "grow the pie."

Although growing on the pie seems a more apt metaphor. Defending 15% fees on second-year subscription is pretty difficult. There's no marketing, very little fraud risk. It's really rent-seeking behaviour – which of course is the commercial point of the walled garden approach.

This is Apple exploiting a very lucrative market position, one that they did invest quite a lot of money in – and took quite a gamble – to create.



> This is Apple exploiting a very lucrative market position, one that they did invest quite a lot of money in – and took quite a gamble – to create.

What's wrong with that?


Consumers get perma-shafted.


Counterargument: consumers are free to switch their entire phone to enjoy the rent-seeking behavior of another party on another platform.


Definitely no counter-arguments from me. Because of Apple's pricing insanity, I've made sure I own zero of their devices, and I think every person capable of independent thought should do the same.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: