I think you mean "a group of scientists have theorised that a recording obtained by the Associated Press, which the AP claimed to be 'generally consistent' with the sound heard by some US diplomats who reported being attacked, could be a recording of crickets", which is a very different thing than suggesting the attack has been "revealed" as crickets.

For someone so concerned with not being "played" by the media, you seem strangely happy to play exactly the same kinds of games with the facts.