Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Makes sense, though I guess I don't understand why a hiring decision-maker wouldn't just ask an otherwise good candidate, "Hey, what's up with 2010 to 2012?"

Do hiring people (HR, managers, etc) tend to assume the worst of people?

I've hired a few people in my career, though never with any sort of restrictions placed upon me. I guess it would not have occurred to me that a resume lacking a perfectly recorded timeline of work-age experiences should be a disqualifier.

I suppose this idea that a gap in a resume is bad is pervasive in modern HR departments?

I'm sure it depends on industry, level of job, availability of candidates, etc, of course; but otherwise, this is the mainstream thought?

I have at times gone for years of just fucking around with nothing noteworthy to declare on my CV, and I've never had a difficult time getting hired. Maybe it's not as big of a deal in my fields. I guess the only jobs where I've worked for Faceless Megacorp are ones right after I earned various degrees, so a resume gap wouldn't have come up then. Still, I've never been questioned about my resume timeline in 25 years of working, so the idea just seems a little strange to me.

It makes me a little sad for people, in a way. Everybody should be able to fuck around for a while if they want to.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: