Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder if this would fall under protections for satire.


Fair use actually makes a distinction between satire and parody: satire isn't protected. https://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/intellect...

Technically, parody is using X's IP to comment on X; satire is using X's IP to comment on something else. So if this is parody, it would plausibly fall under America's fair use test.


Didn't volkswagen "fix" some emission tests in this manner?


Yeah they were fined like $15B and had people arrested and criminally charged in multiple countries.

They had 'defeat devices' that detected test environments and changed how the car ran so that it would pass emissions testing.


That's less than a month worth of revenue.

And only 2 or 3 people are in jail afaik.

Only a light slap on the wrist.


Or a year worth of profits. Hardly a slap on the wrist.


Did the CEO Martin Winterkorn? Looks like he got away though.



It falls under the protection of the Streisand effect.


I bet VW won't sue anyone about this soon to not have new negative publicity. And I agree, this is clearly satire.


Satirical software would be a cool new trend in Open Source.

I think about things like a library for leader election, where there is a "Russian hacker" service that manipulates the election result or maybe a logging framework that accumulates logs and occassionally emails them to journalists.


https://www.jollycode.org/, mentioned in another comment, is exactly what I was looking for.


I bet nobody from VW is going to know this exists for a year or more, if ever. How many VW corporate employees do you think browse HN?


> How many VW corporate employees do you think browse HN?

Out of more than 600'000? A bunch, I bet.

(Yes, I was shocked at the number too)


VW, presumably, has armies of software engineers/other technical people (That you might find on HN, etc) so I don't think it's unreasonable to assume someone will stumble across it.

It's also worth saying that even if they don't have a automated system to look for x-infringement, they have many employees who when bored could end up searching for (say) Volkswagen on github.

Whether they care or not is another matter...


It's a pretty blatant use of their trademark. (It outright uses their name) I have my doubts.


Trademarks are only protected in the US if there is risk of consumer confusion during commerce:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement#Factors


There is definitely a credible risk of consumer confusion here - when a consumer faces a need to cheat a test it is unclear which Volkswagen the consumer would have to use. I think the original auto Volkswagen has a strong case here (note - IANAL, just another confused consumer).


We should file a suite against Volkswagen just to test - I’m sure it’ll pass


Quick fork that shit




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: