Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My understanding (probably naive) is the footings driven into the ground are deep enough to go below this area and rest on stable rock.

That’s how it was explained in a documentary about mission bay (south of AT&T).

edit: For those interested, this documentary explains the approach https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyjijQS2dAk&t=1219s



Do you remember the name of this documentary? A quick search didn't turn up anything. I live in the area and would love to learn more about this.


I recall seeing some computer animation to this effect in a documentary (in the UK) about the Millennium tower tilting - searching on that brought up some confirmation in the form of a press release by the TJPA:

http://tjpa.org/uploads/2016/08/301-Mission-Press-Release-Au...

The 60-story Millennium Tower is made of concrete rather than steel, resulting in a very heavy building. This heavy structure rests on layers of soft, compressible soil. The foundation of the Tower, however, consists only of a concrete slab supported by short piles that fail to reach the bedrock below. That foundation is inadequate to prevent settlement of a building with the weight of the Tower. In contrast, the Salesforce Tower and 181 Fremont Tower, also adjacent to the Transit Center, are supported on piles drilled down to bedrock. Millennium Partners’ poor design decision is the cause of the tilt and excessive vertical settlement of the Millennium Tower.


Sure, at about the 20:00 is when they discuss Mission Bay specifically. The whole documentary is solid though if you have more time. I learned a lot and found it very fascinating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyjijQS2dAk&t=1219s




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: