Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The Register article linked by the blog post ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/09/google_caffeine_expl... ) is more informative than the blog post itself.

To me, it looks like the blogger makes a few wrong assumptions: He confuses Google Instant with Google Realtime. He assumes that "something like database triggers" is actually very much like database triggers and could be e.g. used to check the integrity of the data. He goes wildly off on a tangent with Internet DOM.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: