I think he started out well, pointing out that SQL is a DSL for database queries. But the mapping between Cascalog and SQL wasn't clear, without further explanation it seems to be different for the sake of being different.
I would have appreciated a DSL which could obviously be used as a way to query an SQL database more than the examples in the article.
I would have appreciated a DSL which could obviously be used as a way to query an SQL database more than the examples in the article.