When someone says something like "Wake up" it's a pretty reliable indicator they're off in conspiracy theory land. The reason they didn't find anything is Hillary deleted thousands of relevant emails from a server she shouldn't have had and the only person who could call her out on the lying took the 5th.
Wake up indeed. Do you really believe what you write?
> When someone says something like "Wake up" it's a pretty reliable indicator they're off in conspiracy theory land.
I'm saying wake up to the real world. By the way, a statement like that has a lot more impact if you don't immediately follow it with a conspiracy theory.
> The reason they didn't find anything is....
So what you're saying is Mueller has found more solid evidence of improprieties between Russia and the Trump campaign in 10 months than 5 years of politically motivated witch hunting. I'm glad we agree on that, and I'm sure you're far more worried about the sitting President of the USA's Russia links than something so thoroughly investigated as Benghazi or debunked as 'that uranium thing', that even if they where real would be somewhat overshadowed.
Did you believe the Trump campaigns 'lock her up' slogan? Can you fathom why he didn't follow through on his campaign promise to launch a full investigation into her? Could it possibly, just possibly, be because there is nothing and he only banged that drum just to excite people like you?
>I'm saying wake up to the real world. By the way, a statement like that has a lot more impact if you don't immediately follow it with a conspiracy theory.
That's all on the record.
>So what you're saying is Mueller has found more solid evidence of improprieties between Russia and the Trump campaign in 10 months than 5 years of politically motivated witch hunting.
Has he? Exactly what has Mueller found?
By the way, let me suggest to you that if the justice department ever asks you for emails relating to an investigation you'll almost certainly end up going to jail if you delete a bunch of them and then claim you were just deleting private email.
I keep wondering if, as in the case of Bill Clinton, 25 years after it matters Democrats will be willing to admit that yes, Hillary broke the law.
Ehh, that's a half truth at best as even a cursory bit of research would tell you.
> Has he? Exactly what has Mueller found?
Enough to get two felony incitements and dozens of sealed ones? I mean, I'd expect you to know this as you care about these investigations based not on party but on their individual merit. So, you must be following this one really closely because that is already far more than the entire Benghazi investigation found and it's just getting started.
> By the way, let me suggest to you that if the justice department ever asks you for emails relating to an investigation you'll almost certainly end up going to jail if you delete a bunch of them and then claim you were just deleting private email.
All in all, cool, but I care a lot more about the current sitting president of the USA's links to Russia than I do about some deleted emails. And if you don't, then I suggest waking up.
>Enough to get two felony incitements and dozens of sealed ones? I mean, I'd expect you to know this as you care about these investigations based not on party but on their individual merit.
So what's in the sealed indictments?
Don't include links to polifact if you want people to take you seriously. Seriously.
just to clarify ? the question itself has merit ? no ? the description of the commander in chief however may not have shown respect, for which I accept your comment and take the downvotes on the chin.
