Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No one is arguing that Alice and Bob should be prevented from engaging in good ol' American trade.

We're arguing that when drugs are ubiquitous -- as easy to access as pushing a button -- you'll spawn far more addicts than would have otherwise been created.

When an addict's life is destroyed by these horrific tools of pleasure we've created, are they going to take solace in the fact that they were able to use technology to enable their habit?

People become addicts for many reasons. One of the main ways is by being at a party among friends. No one expects to be addicted to this stuff, so they try a bit.

In the old days, they had one option: Get more from their friend, which may not work forever. In modern times, they can get as much as they want from the darknet markets. Bitcoin ATMs make it trivial, too. You don't even need to be vetted by Coinbase.

It's not just theoretical. People have witnessed the markets causing this.



Doesn't that mean we should also shut down casinos, for example?

I don't think the answer has ever been "make it so people can't buy the stuff", because that can't work. Instead, I believe that education, quality control, and help towards addicts would work much better.


Education, quality control and help towards addicts implies the need for regulation and taxation of profits. For instance, gambling and casinos tend to be permitted but tightly controlled by law in many countries, for exactly this reason. An entirely anonymous market will have trouble enabling regulation and taxation to offset the damage done.


So legalize, tightly regulate, and tax drugs? The solution seems obvious, if it works for casinos...


I thought it was known today that drugs aren't a problem, but people to whom drugs are the only relieve and the criminalisation of those.


Absolutely. It's well established that drugs aren't a problem. I mean, it's only the leading death cause of young Americans. Nothing to see here folks.


Leading cause of death in a group with an ultra-low death rate? You could make the case that it's a problem, but that's not enough by itself.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: