Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Security breaches are bad for capital. Privacy invasions like this are good for capital.


Security breaches are bad for one party's capital, good for another party's capital.

It's interesting to contemplate WHY is there a difference between the two. Security and Private both nasciently have something to do with "info I'd like to keep to myself", but I'm not sure I can come up with a hard delineation between the two, at least when you try to go above "A/S/L" and below "user/pass".


A security breach allows to use the victim's resources: from CPU and bandwidth to money directly on your bank account.

A privacy breach allows... what? Where's a direct threat?

A privacy breach can be a first step to a security breach, though. Social engineering is all about it. Social networks can be, too.


>A privacy breach allows... what? Where's a direct threat?

A privacy breach could mean that your job application is rejected, that you pay higher interest on a loan or higher insurance premiums.

It could mean that your health insurance refuses cover for some treatment because some data points towards a pre-existing condition.

You could be rejected as a tenant based on the scoring done by a referencing agency or you could get searched every time you cross a border.

In a more unlikely event could even become the victim of a miscarriage of justice or get blackmailed by a corrupt government official.


A privacy breach allows... what? Where's a direct threat?

Any means of authentication that relies on personal data. SSN, mother's maiden name, postal address, date of birth, etc.


Privacy is the basis for fundamental freedoms.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: