Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They could simply have used the terms "Unsure quality after" and "Discard after"


Or "could be dodgy" and "will be dodgy".


Fellow Australian think we are going to have to explain to most of the rest of the world what dodgy means first :)

Anyway shouldn't it be "might be dodgy" and "is dodgy"?


Except the British, or at least Mancunians. "Ugh tastes a bit dodgy" does not sound foreign to me in any way.


How would using more confusing terms help?


"Guaranteed until xxx" - all brands guarantee their products before the best before.

"Hazardous after xxx" - literally, this could kill you after this date.

The other problem is forcing brands to put "hazardous" on their labels.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: