Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ok, we've put "Google Code-In winner" in the title since it's more specific.

Still please don't comment like this here. The combination of harshness and niticking is particularly unwelcome.



I agree with his intent but not his delivery.

However, asking a community with many engineers to not harshly nitpick someone else's contribution is a futile task.


If we ask politely and explain why, most people are happy to play along. It's easy to see how trying for higher-quality discussion is good for the community.


> asking a community with many engineers to not harshly nitpick someone else's contribution is a futile task.

Behaviour like this also not acceptable in "real life", neither at work place nor anywhere else.

Maybe some get away with that cliché behaviour, but in my experience this is just an inappropriate way to deal with their own weaknesses, leading to embarrassing situations (for them) as soon as they get to work with people more experienced than they are.


I agree that it's not acceptable. Doesn't mean it's not futile to ask for it to stop.


I have worked in professional software engineering environments where people acted professionally, and plan to create one in my new company. The mentality that "nerds will be nerds" enables and perpetuates this counterproductive behavior.


Same here. But a new engineer I hired who looked great on paper and on his interviews is just obscene. He's not a great engineer to boot. Can't fire him because I need him for now. I don't think it's a self perpetuating stereotype. I think some people are wired that way, and engineers tend to skew there because of the way their brains work (obviously not every engineer).


> I think some people are wired that way

How is this attitude different from perpetuating stereotypes?


Don't for get that some people who think they are smart really are.


So what? Is "smartness" an excuse for the unwillingless to learn productive (or at least non-destructive) social behaviour?

If anything, I'd argue it is exactly the reverse: From people describing themselves as "smart" I expect the ability to learn this even more.

They are definitely not too dumb to learn this: Internalizing some basic rules of social behaviour is not harder than learning a new programming language or familiarizing with a new framework. It's not because they are unable, but because they don't care and got away with it so far - by which I mean they didn't have to face the consequences of the damage they created in the past. That's why any reasonable manager (or community leader) needs to create an environment where they have to care early on, before anything significant happens.


but the inherent futility of the belief that its better to believe its futile to ask people to be nice is a worse situation




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: