> Why don't people just stop submitting WSJ articles?

Ehrm, huh? That is your proposed solution?

Just a SWAG: The articles are interesting. This claim can be backed up by the fact that WSJ articles show up on the front page fairly frequently.

I'm not sure what SWAG means but WSJ clearly doesn't want news aggregator visitors to view their articles for free. So the complaints should be directed at the WSJ, not the news aggregator.

I don't have a solution I'm just saying it's WSJ's fault here, not HN.